Newsletters
Attorneys Retained by Auto Insurers: Duty to the Insured
When a lawsuit is filed against an automobile insurance company's insured for damages allegedly suffered by a claimant in an automobile accident with the insured, the insurance company has a duty to defend the insured. A part of the insurance company's duty can be the right to retain an attorney for the insured's defense and to pay that attorney's fee. Because the insurance company selects and pays the defense counsel, questions arise regarding who is the attorney's client and whether the attorney owes a duty to only the insured or to both the insured and the insurance company.
Liability of Non-Manufacturing Seller in Automotive Products Liability Cases
A plaintiff in an automotive products liability case against the manufacturer or seller of a motor vehicle generally has to prove that the vehicle at the time of sale contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk of death, personal injury, or property damage when the vehicle was used for its intended purpose and that the defect caused an accident or similar incident, such as a vehicle fire, that resulted in the damage or loss for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages. Under traditional legal principles, any party involved in the chain of transactions leading up to the retail sale of the vehicle, including the dealer who sold the car or truck, could be held liable in such a case. Motor vehicle dealers, like any party against whom a legal action is brought, would like to limit their potential liability to matters for which they can be shown to have a direct and undeniable responsibility.
Insurer's Duty to Defend
Under an insurance policy, an insurance company has two principal obligations. One of those obligations is the insurance company's duty to defend the insured in the event of a claim within the policy's coverage. The insurance company's duty to defend is triggered when the insured gives the insurance company notice of the claim or lawsuit against the insured. The duty to defend an insured is controlled by statute and common law.
Overview of Automotive Products Liability Law
The everyday operation of millions of cars and trucks on the streets and highways of the United States, and the massive resulting toll in deaths, personal injuries, and property damage caused by motor vehicle accidents, have inevitably created a situation in which the manufacturers and sellers of motor vehicles are implicated as potential defendants in legal actions seeking compensation for the losses arising from such accidents. Products liability law, a subset of the branch of the legal system called tort law, provides the legal standards for determining the potential liability of motor vehicle manufacturers and their dealers in such cases. (The principles of products liability law also apply to non-automotive products, but our discussion here will focus on the law of products liability as it relates to motor vehicles.)
Underinsured/Uninsured Motorists Exhaustion Requirements
Underinsured motorist and uninsured motorist provisions in auto insurance policies often contain language stating that the underinsured or uninsured motorist coverage will not become available until the policy limits of all insurance policies that are applicable to the accident have been exhausted by the payment of judgments or settlements. Such exhaustion requirements are included in the policy because of the substitute or supplemental nature of the coverage and the understandable desire of the insurer to assure that all other available coverage has been applied before it is obligated to pay benefits under the underinsured or uninsured motorist provisions of the policy.
